From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Can't find not null constraint, but \d+ shows that |
Date: | 2024-04-10 13:58:49 |
Message-ID: | 202404101358.iet3euazs5zf@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
It turns out that trying to close all holes that lead to columns marked
not-null without a pg_constraint row is not possible within the ALTER
TABLE framework, because it can happen outside it also. Consider this
CREATE DOMAIN dom1 AS integer;
CREATE TABLE notnull_tbl (a dom1, b int, PRIMARY KEY (a, b));
DROP DOMAIN dom1 CASCADE;
In this case you'll end up with b having attnotnull=true and no
constraint; and no amount of messing with tablecmds.c will fix it.
So I propose to instead allow those constraints, and treat them as
second-class citizens. We allow dropping them with ALTER TABLE DROP NOT
NULL, and we allow to create a backing full-fledged constraint with SET
NOT NULL or ADD CONSTRAINT. So here's a partial crude initial patch to
do that.
One thing missing here is pg_dump support. If you just dump this table,
it'll end up with no constraint at all. That's obviously bad, so I
propose we have pg_dump add a regular NOT NULL constraint for those, to
avoid perpetuating the weird situation further.
Another thing I wonder if whether I should use the existing
set_attnotnull() instead of adding drop_orphaned_notnull(). Or we could
just inline the code in ATExecDropNotNull, since it's small and
self-contained.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Postgres is bloatware by design: it was built to house
PhD theses." (Joey Hellerstein, SIGMOD annual conference 2002)
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Handle-ALTER-.-DROP-NOT-NULL-when-no-pg_constraint-r.patch | text/x-diff | 9.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2024-04-10 14:14:51 | Re: Transparent column encryption |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-04-10 13:57:35 | Re: Detoasting optionally to make Explain-Analyze less misleading |