| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Improve heapgetpage() performance, overhead from serializable |
| Date: | 2024-04-07 04:49:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20240407044935.ox4d3limgt5g3re3@awork3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2024-01-22 13:01:31 +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 9:58 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > And 397->320ms
> > for something as core as this, is imo worth considering on its own.
>
> Hi Andres, this interesting work seems to have fallen off the radar --
> are you still planning to move forward with this for v17?
I had completely forgotten about this patch, but some discussion around
streaming read reminded me of it. Here's a rebased version, with conflicts
resolved and very light comment polish and a commit message. Given that
there's been no changes otherwise in the last months, I'm inclined to push in
a few hours.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Reduce-branches-in-heapgetpage-s-per-tuple-loop.patch | text/x-diff | 5.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2024-04-07 05:07:22 | Re: Improve heapgetpage() performance, overhead from serializable |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-04-07 04:33:12 | Re: CASE control block broken by a single line comment |