From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm |
Date: | 2024-04-07 01:39:17 |
Message-ID: | 20240407013917.r5o7qd7flgnepo2n@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2024-04-07 00:45:31 +0200, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Apr 2024 at 22:21, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > The small regression for small results is still kinda visible, I haven't yet
> > tested the patch downthread.
>
> Thanks a lot for the faster test script, I'm also impatient. I still
> saw the small regression with David his patch. Here's a v6 where I
> think it is now gone. I added inline to internal_put_bytes too. I
> think that helped especially because for two calls to
> internal_put_bytes len is a constant (1 and 4) that is smaller than
> PqSendBufferSize. So for those calls the compiler can now statically
> eliminate the new codepath because "len >= PqSendBufferSize" is known
> to be false at compile time.
Nice.
> Also I incorporated all of Ranier his comments.
Changing the global vars to size_t seems mildly bogus to me. All it's
achieving is to use slightly more memory. It also just seems unrelated to the
change.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Naylor | 2024-04-07 01:40:15 | Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash? |
Previous Message | Melanie Plageman | 2024-04-07 01:33:51 | Re: Streaming read-ready sequential scan code |