From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: DOCS: add helpful partitioning links |
Date: | 2024-03-28 17:52:29 |
Message-ID: | 202403281752.blk6524qy4n3@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2024-Mar-28, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> LGTM.
>
> The commitfest entry is marked as RFC already.
>
> Thanks for taking care of the comments.
Thanks for reviewing. I noticed a typo "seperate", fixed here. Also, I
noticed that Robert added an empty line which looks in the source like
he's breaking the paragraph -- but because he didn't add a closing </para>
and an opening <para> to the next one, there's no actual new paragraph
in the HTML output.
My first instinct was to add those. However, upon reading the text, I
noticed that the previous paragraph ends without offering an example,
and then we attach the example to the paragraph that takes about CREATE
TABLE LIKE showing both techniques, which seemed a bit odd. So instead
I joined both paragraphs back together. I'm unsure which one looks
better. Which one do you vote for?
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"No hay ausente sin culpa ni presente sin disculpa" (Prov. francés)
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
with-extra-para.png | image/png | 101.7 KB |
no-extra-para.png | image/png | 101.5 KB |
0001-doc-Improve-Partition-Maintenance-section.patch | text/x-diff | 7.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2024-03-28 17:53:30 | Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2024-03-28 17:45:54 | Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` |