| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Kumar, Sachin" <ssetiya(at)amazon(dot)com>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects |
| Date: | 2024-03-27 15:08:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20240327150826.GB3994937@nathanxps13 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 10:54:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> What is the status of this? In the commitfest, this patch is marked as
>> "Needs Review" with Nathan as reviewer - Nathan, were you going to take
>> another look at this or was your mail from January 12th a full review?
>
> In my mind the ball is in Nathan's court. I feel it's about
> committable, but he might not agree.
I'll prioritize another round of review on this one. FWIW I don't remember
having any major concerns on a previous version of the patch set I looked
at.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-03-27 15:10:31 | Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-03-27 15:05:57 | Re: pgsql: Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots. |