| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | 1026592243(at)qq(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #18377: Assert false in "partdesc->nparts >= pinfo->nparts", fileName="execPartition.c", lineNumber=1943 |
| Date: | 2024-03-19 12:33:01 |
| Message-ID: | 202403191233.myi4xwsav5om@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 2024-Mar-06, David Rowley wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 20:17, PG Bug reporting form
> <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> > 1943 Assert(partdesc->nparts >= pinfo->nparts);
> > (gdb) p partdesc->nparts
> > $1 = 1
> > (gdb) p pinfo->nparts
> > $2 = 2
>
> The following comment says this shouldn't happen, but apparently it can:
>
> * Because we request detached partitions to be included, and
> * detaching waits for old transactions, it is safe to assume that
> * no partitions have disappeared since this query was planned.
>
> Added Álvaro as he knows this area best.
Oh, ugh, apologies, I hadn't noticed this report. I'll have a look ...
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2024-03-19 14:26:16 | Re: BUG #18396: Assert in gistFindCorrectParent() fails on inserting large tuples into gist index |
| Previous Message | Tender Wang | 2024-03-19 12:07:12 | Re: BUG #18396: Assert in gistFindCorrectParent() fails on inserting large tuples into gist index |