From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Li, Yong" <yoli(at)ebay(dot)com> |
Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Bagga, Rishu" <bagrishu(at)amazon(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Debnath, Shawn" <sdn(at)ebay(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, "Shyrabokau, Anton" <antons(at)ebay(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal to add page headers to SLRU pages |
Date: | 2024-03-06 13:11:44 |
Message-ID: | 202403061311.hqpac6vs4zt4@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
I suppose this is important to do if we ever want to move SLRUs into
shared buffers. However, I wonder about the extra time this adds to
pg_upgrade. Is this something we should be concerned about? Is there
any measurement/estimates to tell us how long this would be? Right now,
if you use a cloning strategy for the data files, the upgrade should be
pretty quick ... but the amount of data in pg_xact and pg_multixact
could be massive, and the rewrite is likely to take considerable time.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Las cosas son buenas o malas segun las hace nuestra opinión" (Lisias)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) | 2024-03-06 13:13:07 | RE: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2024-03-06 12:59:31 | Re: Combine Prune and Freeze records emitted by vacuum |