Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date: 2024-03-06 07:41:06
Message-ID: 20240306074106.mg6w4koohdlworbs@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2024-03-05 16:41:30 +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> I'd like to push 0001 and 0002 shortly, and then do another sweep over
> 0003, with remaining feedback, and get that in so we get some
> buildfarm testing before the remaining polishing work on
> tidstore/vacuum.

A few ARM buildfarm animals are complaining:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=parula&dt=2024-03-06%2007%3A34%3A02
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=snakefly&dt=2024-03-06%2007%3A34%3A03
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=massasauga&dt=2024-03-06%2007%3A33%3A18

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-03-06 08:02:17 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Previous Message Mats Kindahl 2024-03-06 07:31:31 Re: Hooking into ExplainOneQuery() complicated by missing standard_ExplainOneQuery