Re: FW: huge SubtransSLRU and SubtransBuffer wait_event

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: James Pang <jamespang886(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FW: huge SubtransSLRU and SubtransBuffer wait_event
Date: 2024-03-01 07:35:41
Message-ID: 202403010735.telrs2y7mlps@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 2024-Mar-01, James Pang wrote:

> one question:
> we need to increase all SLRU buffers together , MULTIXACT, XACT,
> Subtrans, COMMIT TS , for example, got all of them doubled based on
> existing size ?

No need.

> or only increase Subtrans , or Subtrans and multixact ?

Just increase the sizes for the ones that are causing you pain. You can
have a look at pg_stat_slru for some metrics that might be useful in
determining which are those.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2024-03-01 08:57:13 Re: Optimizing count(), but Explain estimates wildly off
Previous Message James Pang 2024-03-01 06:56:38 Re: FW: huge SubtransSLRU and SubtransBuffer wait_event