Re: Relation bulk write facility

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Relation bulk write facility
Date: 2024-02-27 20:59:14
Message-ID: 20240227205914.pblfmucp4kxkyuzg@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2024-02-27 15:45:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
> With AIX out of the picture, lapwing will be the only remaining
> animal testing MAXALIGN less than 8. That seems like a single
> point of failure ... should we spin up another couple 32-bit
> animals? I had supposed that my faithful old PPC animal mamba
> was helping to check this, but I see that under NetBSD it's
> joined the ALIGNOF_DOUBLE==8 crowd.

I can set up a i386 animal, albeit on an amd64 kernel. But I don't think the
latter matters.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2024-02-27 21:03:27 Remove --with-CC autoconf option
Previous Message Amonson, Paul D 2024-02-27 20:46:06 RE: Popcount optimization using AVX512