From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mats Kindahl <mats(at)timescale(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: glibc qsort() vulnerability |
Date: | 2024-02-13 18:10:44 |
Message-ID: | 20240213181044.GA13935@nathanxps13 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 09:43:18AM +0100, Mats Kindahl wrote:
> Maybe we should change to use the original version equivalent to the inline
> function above since that works better with surrounding code?
I don't think that's necessary. We just need to be cognizant of it when
using inlined sorts, which are pretty rare at the moment. Your patches
should still be a net improvement in many cases because most qsorts use a
function pointer to the comparator.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joseph Koshakow | 2024-02-13 18:31:22 | Fix overflow hazard in interval rounding |
Previous Message | Trevor Kohlman | 2024-02-13 17:56:40 | Re: Feature request support MS Entra ID Authentication from On-premises PostreSQL server |