| From: | Sutou Kouhei <kou(at)clear-code(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz |
| Cc: | andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com, zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations |
| Date: | 2024-02-09 04:19:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20240209.131950.2115418231642422252.kou@clear-code.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
In <ZcMIDgkdSrz5ibvf(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
"Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations" on Wed, 7 Feb 2024 13:33:18 +0900,
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Hmm. That explains why I was not seeing any differences with this
> callback then. It seems to me that the order of actions to take is
> clear, like:
> - Revert 2889fd23be56 to keep a clean state of the tree, now done with
> 1aa8324b81fa.
Done.
> - Dive into the strlen() issue, as it really looks like this can
> create more simplifications for the patch discussed on this thread
> with COPY TO.
Done: b619852086ed2b5df76631f5678f60d3bebd3745
> - Revisit what we have here, looking at more profiles to see how HEAD
> an v13 compare. It looks like we are on a good path, but let's tackle
> things one step at a time.
Are you already working on this? Do you want me to write the
next patch based on the current master?
Thanks,
--
kou
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-02-09 04:21:34 | Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-02-09 02:41:55 | Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+ |