Re: confusing / inefficient "need_transcoding" handling in copy

From: Sutou Kouhei <kou(at)clear-code(dot)com>
To: andres(at)anarazel(dot)de
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp
Subject: Re: confusing / inefficient "need_transcoding" handling in copy
Date: 2024-02-08 08:29:46
Message-ID: 20240208.172946.1517607984309720014.kou@clear-code.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

In <20240208(dot)172501(dot)2177371292839763981(dot)kou(at)clear-code(dot)com>
"Re: confusing / inefficient "need_transcoding" handling in copy" on Thu, 08 Feb 2024 17:25:01 +0900 (JST),
Sutou Kouhei <kou(at)clear-code(dot)com> wrote:

> How about the following to avoid needless transcoding?

Oh, sorry. I missed the Michael's patch:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/ZcR9Q9hJ8GedFSCd%40paquier.xyz#e73272b042a22befac7a95f7bcb4fb9a

I withdraw my change.

Thanks,
--
kou

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2024-02-08 08:43:17 Re: A comment in DropRole() contradicts the actual behavior
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2024-02-08 08:25:07 Re: confusing / inefficient "need_transcoding" handling in copy