Re: glibc qsort() vulnerability

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Mats Kindahl <mats(at)timescale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: glibc qsort() vulnerability
Date: 2024-02-06 20:57:38
Message-ID: 20240206205738.GC3891538@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 03:55:58PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> A comparison routine that is not is probably broken, agreed.
> I didn't look through the details of the patch --- I was more
> curious whether we had a version of the qsort bug, because
> if we do, we should fix that too.

+1

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2024-02-06 21:06:05 Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-02-06 20:55:58 Re: glibc qsort() vulnerability