From: | Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Artur Zakirov <zaartur(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Checking MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_WAL_SUMMARIES |
Date: | 2024-02-02 08:41:56 |
Message-ID: | 20240202174156.0272031c68033037abfe4fdf@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 01:11:27 +0100
Artur Zakirov <zaartur(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> during reading the source code of new incremental backup functionality
> I noticed that the following condition can by unintentional:
>
> /*
> * For newer server versions, likewise create pg_wal/summaries
> */
> if (PQserverVersion(conn) < MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_WAL_SUMMARIES)
> {
> ...
>
> if (pg_mkdir_p(summarydir, pg_dir_create_mode) != 0 &&
> errno != EEXIST)
> pg_fatal("could not create directory \"%s\": %m", summarydir);
> }
>
> This is from src/bin/pg_basebackup/pg_basebackup.c.
>
> Is the condition correct? Shouldn't it be ">=". Otherwise the function
> will create "/summaries" only for older PostgreSQL versions.
>
> I've attached a patch to fix it in case this is a typo.
I also think it should be ">="
Also, if so, I don't think the check of MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_PG_WAL
in the block is required, because the directory name is always pg_wal
in the new versions.
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
>
> --
> Artur
--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sutou Kouhei | 2024-02-02 08:46:18 | Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations |
Previous Message | Nazir Bilal Yavuz | 2024-02-02 08:41:07 | Re: Checking MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_WAL_SUMMARIES |