From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Nathan Bossart <nathan(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: core dumps in auto_prewarm, tests succeed |
Date: | 2024-01-23 17:28:18 |
Message-ID: | 20240123172818.ax62th3chniot37r@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2024-01-22 16:27:43 -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Here is a patch.
LGTM.
> This might be a topic for another thread, but I do wonder whether we could
> put a generic pg_controldata check in node->stop that would at least make
> sure that the state is some sort of expected shut-down state. My first
> thought is that it could be a tad expensive, but... maybe it wouldn't be
> too bad.
I think that'd probably would be a good idea - I suspect there'd need to be a
fair number of exceptions, but that it'd be easier to change uses of ->stop()
to the exception case where needed, than to add a new function doing checking
and converting most things to that.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2024-01-23 17:30:05 | Re: core dumps in auto_prewarm, tests succeed |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2024-01-23 17:13:32 | Re: psql: Allow editing query results with \gedit |