Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com, nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com, hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, barwick(at)gmail(dot)com, jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com, pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com, jakub(dot)wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation
Date: 2024-01-23 04:15:21
Message-ID: 20240123.131521.1335217266971689766.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:36:31 +1100, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> 2024-01 Commitfest.
>
> Hi, This patch has a CF status of "Needs Review" [1], but it seems
> there was a CFbot test failure last time it was run [2]. Please have a
> look and post an updated version if necessary.

Thanks! I have added the necessary includes to the header file this
patch adds. With this change, "make headerscheck" now passes. However,
when I run "make cpluspluscheck" in my environment, it generates a
large number of errors in other areas, but I didn't find one related
to this patch.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment Content-Type Size
v32-0001-Export-wal_sync_method-related-functions.patch text/x-patch 3.8 KB
v32-0002-Introduce-undo-log-implementation.patch text/x-patch 43.6 KB
v32-0003-In-place-table-persistence-change.patch text/x-patch 29.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2024-01-23 04:23:20 Re: Network failure may prevent promotion
Previous Message Peter Smith 2024-01-23 04:14:42 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby