Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations

From: Sutou Kouhei <kou(at)clear-code(dot)com>
To: sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations
Date: 2024-01-12 05:46:15
Message-ID: 20240112.144615.157925223373344229.kou@clear-code.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Here is the current summary for a this discussion to make
COPY format extendable. It's for reaching consensus and
starting implementing the feature. (I'll start implementing
the feature once we reach consensus.) If you have any
opinion, please share it.

Confirmed:

1.1 Making COPY format extendable will not reduce performance.
[1]

Decisions:

2.1 Use separated handler for COPY TO and COPY FROM because
our COPY TO implementation (copyto.c) and COPY FROM
implementation (coypfrom.c) are separated.
[2]

2.2 Don't use system catalog for COPY TO/FROM handlers. We can
just use a function(internal) that returns a handler instead.
[3]

2.3 The implementation must include documentation.
[5]

2.4 The implementation must include test.
[6]

2.5 The implementation should be consist of small patches
for easy to review.
[6]

2.7 Copy{To,From}State must have a opaque space for
handlers.
[8]

2.8 Export CopySendData() and CopySendEndOfRow() for COPY TO
handlers.
[8]

2.9 Make "format" in PgMsg_CopyOutResponse message
extendable.
[9]

2.10 Make makeNode() call avoidable in function(internal)
that returns COPY TO/FROM handler.
[9]

2.11 Custom COPY TO/FROM handlers must be able to parse
their options.
[11]

Discussing:

3.1 Should we use one function(internal) for COPY TO/FROM
handlers or two function(internal)s (one is for COPY TO
handler and another is for COPY FROM handler)?
[4]

3.2 If we use separated function(internal) for COPY TO/FROM
handlers, we need to define naming rule. For example,
<method_name>_to(internal) for COPY TO handler and
<method_name>_from(internal) for COPY FROM handler.
[4]

3.3 Should we use prefix or suffix for function(internal)
name to avoid name conflict with other handlers such as
tablesample handlers?
[7]

3.4 Should we export Copy{To,From}State? Or should we just
provide getters/setters to access Copy{To,From}State
internal?
[10]

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20231204.153548.2126325458835528809.kou%40clear-code.com
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/ZXEUIy6wl4jHy6Nm%40paquier.xyz
[3] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAD21AoAhcZkAp_WDJ4sSv_%2Bg2iCGjfyMFgeu7MxjnjX_FutZAg%40mail.gmail.com
[4] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAD21AoDkoGL6yJ_HjNOg9cU%3DaAdW8uQ3rSQOeRS0SX85LPPNwQ%40mail.gmail.com
[5] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/TY3PR01MB9889C9234CD220A3A7075F0DF589A%40TY3PR01MB9889.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
[6] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/ZXbiPNriHHyUrcTF%40paquier.xyz
[7] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20231214.184414.2179134502876898942.kou%40clear-code.com
[8] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20231221.183504.1240642084042888377.kou%40clear-code.com
[9] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/ZYTfqGppMc9e_w2k%40paquier.xyz
[10] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAD21AoD%3DUapH4Wh06G6H5XAzPJ0iJg9YcW8r7E2UEJkZ8QsosA%40mail.gmail.com
[11] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20240110.152023.1920937326588672387.kou%40clear-code.com

Thanks,
--
kou

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message torikoshia 2024-01-12 05:56:45 doc: add LITERAL tag to RETURNING
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2024-01-12 05:41:09 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby