Re: pg_ctl command option anomalies

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neha Khatri <nehakhatri5(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_ctl command option anomalies
Date: 2017-04-20 05:53:47
Message-ID: 20233.1492667627@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

Neha Khatri <nehakhatri5(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Some of the pg_ctl modes do not require following options:
> -m, -w, -t, -c, -l, -o, -p

Um ... all of those except -c and -w require an argument AFAIK. Where did
you read that they don't?

The pg_ctl man page does seem to need some work, for instance -t is shown
as requiring an argument in the syntax synopsis, and the textual
description implies that it has one, but

-t
--timeout

should look more like

-t seconds
--timeout=seconds

But on the whole I'd bet that discrepancies of this sort are documentation
bugs not code bugs.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neha Khatri 2017-04-20 06:05:45 Re: pg_ctl command option anomalies
Previous Message Neha Khatri 2017-04-20 05:12:36 pg_ctl command option anomalies