| From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | A typo in a messsage? |
| Date: | 2023-12-22 06:49:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20231222.154939.1509525390095583358.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I found the following message introduced by a recent commit.
> errdetail("The first unsummarized LSN is this range is %X/%X.",
Shouldn't the "is" following "LSN" be "in"?
diff --git a/src/backend/backup/basebackup_incremental.c b/src/backend/backup/basebackup_incremental.c
index 42bbe564e2..22b861ce52 100644
--- a/src/backend/backup/basebackup_incremental.c
+++ b/src/backend/backup/basebackup_incremental.c
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ PrepareForIncrementalBackup(IncrementalBackupInfo *ib,
tle->tli,
LSN_FORMAT_ARGS(tli_start_lsn),
LSN_FORMAT_ARGS(tli_end_lsn)),
- errdetail("The first unsummarized LSN is this range is %X/%X.",
+ errdetail("The first unsummarized LSN in this range is %X/%X.",
LSN_FORMAT_ARGS(tli_missing_lsn))));
}
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrei Lepikhov | 2023-12-22 06:53:01 | Optimization outcome depends on the index order |
| Previous Message | Japin Li | 2023-12-22 05:39:27 | Re: Transaction timeout |