| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Georgios <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: index prefetching |
| Date: | 2023-12-21 16:07:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20231221160757.kk2dhl3t3fvbggv5@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2023-12-21 11:00:34 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:33 AM Tomas Vondra
> <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > > I continue to think that we should not have split plain and index only scans
> > > into separate files...
> >
> > I do agree with that opinion. Not just because of this prefetching
> > thread, but also because of the discussions about index-only filters in
> > a nearby thread.
>
> For the record, in the original patch I submitted for this feature, it
> wasn't in separate files. If memory serves, Tom changed it.
>
> So don't blame me. :-)
But I'd like you to feel guilty (no, not really) and fix it (yes, really) :)
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2023-12-21 16:36:43 | Re: Eager page freeze criteria clarification |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2023-12-21 16:00:34 | Re: index prefetching |