Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrei Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry
Date: 2023-12-19 16:14:44
Message-ID: 20231219161444.GD831499@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 10:49:23AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 3:32 AM Andrei Lepikhov
> <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>> 2. I think a separate file for this feature looks too expensive.
>> According to the gist of that code, it is a part of the DSA module.
>
> -1. I think this is a totally different thing than DSA. More files
> aren't nearly as expensive as the confusion that comes from smushing
> unrelated things together.

Agreed. I think there's a decent chance that more functionality will be
added to this registry down the line, in which case it will be even more
important that this stuff stays separate from the tools it is built with.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2023-12-19 16:19:11 Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry
Previous Message Robert Haas 2023-12-19 16:11:35 Re: backtrace_on_internal_error