Hi,
On 2023-12-04 15:08:57 -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:18:05PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > Barring objections or additional feedback, I think I'm inclined to press
> > forward with this one and commit it in the next week or two. I'm currently
> > planning to keep the inline assembly, but I'm considering removing the
> > configuration checks for __atomic_exchange_n() if the availability of
> > __atomic_compare_exchange_n() seems like a reliable indicator of its
> > presence. Thoughts?
I don't think we need the inline asm. Otherwise looks good.
Greetings,
Andres Freund