From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Test 002_pg_upgrade fails with olddump on Windows |
Date: | 2023-12-08 10:51:53 |
Message-ID: | 202312081051.fg4cnf7klxx6@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-Dec-08, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 05:44:53PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Hmm. Yes, it looks like you're right here. That should allow all the
> > scenarios we expect to work to update the paths for the functions.
>
> And done this one as well down to v15, where not only meson, but also
> vpath could have been confused with an update to an incorrect path.
Argh, yeah, this has caused me pain a couple of times. Thanks for fixing.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"If you have nothing to say, maybe you need just the right tool to help you
not say it." (New York Times, about Microsoft PowerPoint)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shubham Khanna | 2023-12-08 11:06:58 | Re: Adding a pg_get_owned_sequence function? |
Previous Message | John Naylor | 2023-12-08 10:46:29 | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |