Re: Could not read from file "pg_subtrans/00F5" at offset 122880: Success.

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org
Cc: laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at, sri(at)ebi(dot)ac(dot)uk, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Could not read from file "pg_subtrans/00F5" at offset 122880: Success.
Date: 2023-11-30 00:39:13
Message-ID: 20231130.093913.2023853649124192997.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-general

At Wed, 29 Nov 2023 18:29:15 +0100, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote in
> The code in master is completely different (it uses pg_pread rather than
> seek + read): it does test for errno and reports accordingly.
>
> So, nothing to do here.

Oops! Thank you and sorry for the noise.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karina Litskevich 2023-11-30 05:30:36 Re: BUG #18212: Functions txid_status() and pg_xact_status() return invalid status of the specified transaction
Previous Message Gurjeet Singh 2023-11-29 21:43:46 Re: Fwd: BUG #18016: REINDEX TABLE failure

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Abdul Qoyyuum 2023-11-30 01:50:47 Re: Fixing or Mitigating this ERROR: invalid page in block 35217 of relation base/16421/3192429
Previous Message Achilleas Mantzios 2023-11-29 21:54:43 Re: Removing oids with pg_repack