From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Catalog domain not-null constraints |
Date: | 2023-11-23 16:38:30 |
Message-ID: | 202311231638.httd7tqo45ux@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-Nov-23, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> This patch set applies the explicit catalog representation of not-null
> constraints introduced by b0e96f3119 for table constraints also to domain
> not-null constraints.
I like the idea of having domain not-null constraints appear in
pg_constraint.
> Since there is no inheritance or primary keys etc., this is much simpler and
> just applies the existing infrastructure to domains as well.
If you create a table with column of domain that has a NOT NULL
constraint, what happens? I mean, is the table column marked
attnotnull, and how does it behave? Is there a separate pg_constraint
row for the constraint in the table? What happens if you do
ALTER TABLE ... DROP NOT NULL for that column?
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Por suerte hoy explotó el califont porque si no me habría muerto
de aburrido" (Papelucho)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2023-11-23 16:45:34 | Re: undetected deadlock in ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2023-11-23 16:35:25 | Re: Catalog domain not-null constraints |