Re: Hide exposed impl detail of wchar.c

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jubilee Young <workingjubilee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: Re: Hide exposed impl detail of wchar.c
Date: 2023-11-21 04:39:43
Message-ID: 20231121043943.GB3521465@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 05:14:17PM -0800, Jubilee Young wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 2:52 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Does pgrx use ascii.h at all?
>
> We don't use utils/ascii.h, no.

Alright. The next minor release isn't until February, so I'll let this one
sit a little while longer in case anyone objects to back-patching something
like this [0].

[0] https://postgr.es/m/attachment/152305/move_is_valid_ascii_v2.patch

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2023-11-21 04:50:15 Re: simplehash: SH_OPTIMIZE_REPEAT for optimizing repeated lookups of the same key
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-11-21 04:37:07 Re: Annoying build warnings from latest Apple toolchain