Re: Logical replication is missing block of rows when sending initial sync?

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com
Cc: depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Logical replication is missing block of rows when sending initial sync?
Date: 2023-11-02 01:17:13
Message-ID: 20231102.101713.170587046871054404.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

At Mon, 30 Oct 2023 07:10:35 +0000, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote in
> I've tried, but I could not reproduce the failure. PSA the script what I did.

I'm not well-versed in the details of logical replication, but does
logical replication inherently operate in such a way that it fully
maintains relationships between tables? If not, isn't it possible that
the issue in question is not about missing referenced data, but merely
a temporary delay?

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Lepikhov 2023-11-02 02:10:40 Re: BUG #18170: Unexpected error: no relation entry for relid 3
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2023-11-01 23:38:47 Re: Wrong result for comparing ROW(...) with IS NOT NULL