From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: A recent message added to pg_upgade |
Date: | 2023-10-27 08:31:54 |
Message-ID: | 202310270831.wk3ycsnxsxy2@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-Oct-27, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> @@ -1433,8 +1433,8 @@ InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot(ReplicationSlotInvalidationCause cause,
> {
> ereport(ERROR,
> errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
> - errmsg("replication slots must not be invalidated during the upgrade"),
> - errhint("\"max_slot_wal_keep_size\" must be set to -1 during the upgrade"));
Hmm, if I read this code right, this error is going to be thrown by the
checkpointer while finishing a checkpoint. Fortunately, the checkpoint
record has already been written, but I don't know what would happen if
this is thrown while trying to write the shutdown checkpoint. Probably
nothing terribly good.
I don't think this is useful. If the setting is invalid during binary
upgrade, let's prevent it from being set at all right from the start of
the upgrade process. In InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot() we could have
just an Assert() or elog(PANIC).
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-10-27 08:35:22 | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2023-10-27 07:52:31 | Re: pg_dump not dumping the run_as_owner setting from version 16? |