Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Ronan Dunklau <ronan(dot)dunklau(at)aiven(dot)io>
Subject: Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers)
Date: 2023-10-13 14:56:51
Message-ID: 20231013145651.fdjao3gwmtu525f4@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2023-10-13 16:44:13 +0200, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> Here is what I had in mind (only this part in the second patch was changed).

Makes sense to me. I think we'll likely eventually want to use a custom
pipeline anyway, and I think we should consider using an optimization level
inbetween "not at all" "as hard as possible"...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2023-10-13 15:28:14 Re: BRIN minmax multi - incorrect distance for infinite timestamp/date
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-10-13 14:55:10 Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers)