| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Remove distprep |
| Date: | 2023-10-06 18:50:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20231006185034.k7jhxgfbwogmtffu@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2023-10-05 17:46:46 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The attached updated patch is also split up like Andres suggested nearby.
Thanks.
> (Not sure if it would be good to commit it that way, but it's easier to look
> at for now for sure.)
I'd push together, but I think the split is useful when looking later as well.
I played around with these for a bit without finding an issue.
The only thing I wonder is whether we ought to keep a maintainer-clean target
(as an alias to distclean), so that extensions that added things to
maintainer-clean continue to work.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Borisov | 2023-10-06 18:59:16 | Re: Index range search optimization |
| Previous Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2023-10-06 18:44:05 | Re: Index range search optimization |