Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument
Date: 2023-10-04 16:12:14
Message-ID: 20231004161214.GA64326@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:51:32AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:27 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Here's a patch. I didn't address the class="parameter" stuff at all. I
>> figured it would be best to handle that separately.
>
> I guess I'll vote for including class=parameter in this addition for
> now, as that appears to be the majority position in the documentation
> today. If we get a consensus to change something, so be it. But also,
> if you don't want to do that, so be it.

WFM. I'll add it before committing, which I plan to do later today.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Jones 2023-10-04 16:19:18 Re: [PATCH] Add CANONICAL option to xmlserialize
Previous Message Robert Haas 2023-10-04 15:51:32 Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument