Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command
Date: 2023-10-04 14:52:11
Message-ID: 20231004145211.GA3178@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 08:50:15PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Is this still being contemplated? What is the status of this?

I'll plan on committing this in the next couple of days.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2023-10-04 14:56:35 Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-10-04 14:51:59 Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument