From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | jacktby jacktby <jacktby(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Set enable_seqscan doesn't take effect? |
Date: | 2023-09-27 17:07:21 |
Message-ID: | 20230927170721.lyemuyiowkz3v36b@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2023-09-28 00:37:41 +0800, jacktby jacktby wrote:
> postgres=# SET enable_seqscan = off;
> SET
> postgres=# explain select * from t;
> QUERY PLAN
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Seq Scan on t (cost=10000000000.00..10000000023.60 rows=1360 width=32)
> (1 row)
>
> postgres=# select * from t;
> a
> -------
> [1,2]
> (1 row)
Sorry to be the grump here:
You start several threads a week, often clearly not having done much, if any,
prior research. Often even sending the same question to multiple lists. It
should not be hard to find an explanation for the behaviour you see here.
pgsql-hackers isn't a "do my work for me service". We're hacking on
postgres. It's fine to occasionally ask for direction, but you're very clearly
exceeding that.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2023-09-27 17:22:48 | Re: Add pg_basetype() function to obtain a DOMAIN base type |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-09-27 17:01:21 | Re: Eager page freeze criteria clarification |