Re: BUG #17928: Standby fails to decode WAL on termination of primary

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, pgbf(at)twiska(dot)com
Subject: Re: BUG #17928: Standby fails to decode WAL on termination of primary
Date: 2023-09-25 01:32:44
Message-ID: 20230925013244.GB303006@rfd.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 01:18:56PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:58 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 09:02:35AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > > I see there was a failure on 16 on the very slow AIX box, and I have
> > > access so looking into that...
> >
> > Lucky you, if I may say ;)
>
> FTR anyone involved with an open source project can get an account on
> the GCC compile farm machines. That particular machine is so
> overloaded that it's practically unusable (~8 hours to run the test,
> hard to run vi etc).

topminnow (gcc23) and frogfish (gcc22) are also part of the compile farm.
They're faster than sungazer (gcc111) for src/test/recovery.

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-09-25 03:07:08 Re: BUG #17928: Standby fails to decode WAL on termination of primary
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2023-09-25 00:18:56 Re: BUG #17928: Standby fails to decode WAL on termination of primary