| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: information_schema and not-null constraints |
| Date: | 2023-09-06 17:52:37 |
| Message-ID: | 202309061752.v3kcmjdangok@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-Sep-04, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> In reference to [1], 0001 attached to this email contains the updated
> view definitions that I propose.
Given the downthread discussion, I propose the attached. There are no
changes to v2, other than dropping the test part.
We can improve the situation for domains separately and likewise for
testing.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-Update-information_schema-definition-for-not-null.patch | text/x-diff | 6.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2023-09-06 18:50:41 | Re: Can a role have indirect ADMIN OPTION on another role? |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2023-09-06 17:33:23 | Re: Can a role have indirect ADMIN OPTION on another role? |