| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Paul Guo <guopa(at)vmware(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Brown <michael(dot)brown(at)discourse(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ? |
| Date: | 2023-09-01 18:31:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20230901183100.GD3180181@nathanxps13 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 01:19:13PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> What about (per git grep no-sync doc) pg_receivewal?
I don't think it's applicable there, either. IIUC that option specifies
whether to sync the data as it is streamed over.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2023-09-01 18:40:17 | Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2023-09-01 18:19:13 | Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ? |