Re: pg_stat_get_backend_subxact() and backend IDs?

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: pg_stat_get_backend_subxact() and backend IDs?
Date: 2023-08-24 02:51:40
Message-ID: 20230824025140.GB1128857@nathanxps13.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 07:32:06PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 10:22:49AM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
>> Looking at the code, this is happening because
>> "pgstat_fetch_stat_local_beentry()"
>> expects to be passed the backend ID as an integer representing a 1-based index
>> referring to "localBackendStatusTable", but "pg_stat_get_backend_subxact()"
>> is presumably intended to take the actual BackendId , as per other
>> "pg_stat_get_XXX()"
>> functions.
>
> Yes, this was changed in d7e39d7, but 10ea0f9 seems to have missed the
> memo.

BTW I'd argue that this is a bug in v16 that we should try to fix before
GA, so I've added an open item [0]. I assigned it to Robert (CC'd) since
he was the committer, but I'm happy to pick it up.

[0] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_16_Open_Items#Open_Issues

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2023-08-24 03:24:04 Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-08-24 02:51:17 Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node