From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: pg_stat_get_backend_subxact() and backend IDs? |
Date: | 2023-08-24 02:51:40 |
Message-ID: | 20230824025140.GB1128857@nathanxps13.lan |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 07:32:06PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 10:22:49AM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
>> Looking at the code, this is happening because
>> "pgstat_fetch_stat_local_beentry()"
>> expects to be passed the backend ID as an integer representing a 1-based index
>> referring to "localBackendStatusTable", but "pg_stat_get_backend_subxact()"
>> is presumably intended to take the actual BackendId , as per other
>> "pg_stat_get_XXX()"
>> functions.
>
> Yes, this was changed in d7e39d7, but 10ea0f9 seems to have missed the
> memo.
BTW I'd argue that this is a bug in v16 that we should try to fix before
GA, so I've added an open item [0]. I assigned it to Robert (CC'd) since
he was the committer, but I'm happy to pick it up.
[0] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_16_Open_Items#Open_Issues
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Smith | 2023-08-24 03:24:04 | Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-08-24 02:51:17 | Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |