Re: Performance degradation on concurrent COPY into a single relation in PG16.

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance degradation on concurrent COPY into a single relation in PG16.
Date: 2023-08-16 22:54:32
Message-ID: 20230816225432.fibahevlqsssj2hv@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2023-08-16 13:15:46 +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Since the wins from this patch were replicated and it has been pushed, I
> understand that this open item can be marked as closed, so I've done
> that.

Thanks!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2023-08-16 22:58:45 Re: walsender "wakeup storm" on PG16, likely because of bc971f4025c (Optimize walsender wake up logic using condition variables)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-08-16 22:49:49 Re: Rename ExtendedBufferWhat in 16?