From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: stats test intermittent failure |
Date: | 2023-08-01 21:19:45 |
Message-ID: | 20230801211945.4nj5to6bbmi4mohi@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2023-07-31 21:03:07 +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Regarding the patch, I have a comment:
>
> -- Test that reuse of strategy buffers and reads of blocks into these reused
> --- buffers while VACUUMing are tracked in pg_stat_io.
> +-- buffers while VACUUMing are tracked in pg_stat_io. If there is sufficient
> +-- demand for shared buffers from concurrent queries, some blocks may be
> +-- evicted from the strategy ring before they can be reused. In such cases
> +-- this, the backend will evict a block from a shared buffer outside of the
> +-- ring and add it to the ring. This is considered an eviction and not a reuse.
>
> The new comment seems not to be accurate if my understanding is correct. How
> about the following?
>
> Test that reuse of strategy buffers and reads of blocks into these
> reused buffers while VACUUMing are tracked in pg_stat_io. If there is
> sufficient demand for shared buffers from concurrent queries, some
> buffers may be pinned by other backends before they can be reused. In
> such cases, the backend will evict a buffer from a shared buffer
> outside of the ring and add it to the ring. This is considered an
> eviction and not a reuse.
I integrated the suggested change of the comment and tweaked it a bit
more. And finally pushed the fix.
Sorry that it took so long.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2023-08-01 21:38:30 | Re: pgsql: Fix search_path to a safe value during maintenance operations. |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2023-08-01 21:16:09 | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |