Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Brown <michael(dot)brown(at)discourse(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
Date: 2023-07-31 18:39:46
Message-ID: 20230731183946.GB537853@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 10:51:38AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Here is a new version of the patch with documentation updates and a couple
> other small improvements.

I just realized I forgot to update the --help output for these utilities.
I'll do that in the next version of the patch.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message José Neves 2023-07-31 18:41:31 RE: CDC/ETL system on top of logical replication with pgoutput, custom client
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-07-31 18:37:02 Re: add timing information to pg_upgrade