Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment
Date: 2023-07-26 21:20:36
Message-ID: 20230726212036.GE3310393@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 05:14:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think we should reword this to just generically claim that holding
> the Relation reference open for the whole transaction reduces overhead.

WFM

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2023-07-26 21:39:25 Re: psql: Could we get "-- " prefixing on the **** QUERY **** outputs? (ECHO_HIDDEN)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-07-26 21:14:08 Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment