Re: psql: Could we get "-- " prefixing on the **** QUERY **** outputs? (ECHO_HIDDEN)

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Kirk Wolak <wolakk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql: Could we get "-- " prefixing on the **** QUERY **** outputs? (ECHO_HIDDEN)
Date: 2023-07-26 04:22:22
Message-ID: 20230726042222.GA3211130@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I took a look at this patch and changed a couple things:

* I made a similar adjustment to a few lines that seem to have been
missed.
* I removed a couple of asterisks from the adjusted lines in order to
maintain the existing line lengths.

Barring additional feedback, I think this is ready for commit.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Change-output-of-ECHO_HIDDEN-comments-to-be-SQL-c.patch text/x-diff 3.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2023-07-26 04:37:07 Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-07-26 04:13:39 Re: Logical walsenders don't process XLOG_CHECKPOINT_SHUTDOWN