Re: remaining sql/json patches

On 2023-Jul-21, Amit Langote wrote:

> I’m thinking of pushing 0001 and 0002 tomorrow barring objections.

0001 looks reasonable to me. I think you asked whether to squash that
one with the other bugfix commit for the same code that you already
pushed to master; I think there's no point in committing as separate
patches, because the first one won't show up in the git_changelog output
as a single entity with the one in 16, so it'll just be additional
noise.

I've looked at 0002 at various points in time and I think it looks
generally reasonable. I think your removal of a couple of newlines
(where originally two appear in sequence) is unwarranted; that the name
to_json[b]_worker is ugly for exported functions (maybe "datum_to_json"
would be better, or you may have better ideas); and that the omission of
the stock comment in the new stanzas in FigureColnameInternal() is
strange. But I don't have anything serious. Do add some ecpg tests ...

Also, remember to pgindent and bump catversion, if you haven't already.

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"No hay hombre que no aspire a la plenitud, es decir,
la suma de experiencias de que un hombre es capaz"