Re: Atomic ops for unlogged LSN

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, John Morris <john(dot)morris(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Atomic ops for unlogged LSN
Date: 2023-07-17 23:15:52
Message-ID: 20230717231552.GA1024337@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 07:08:03PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Awesome. Was there any other feedback on this change which basically is
> just getting rid of a spinlock and replacing it with using atomics?
> It's still in needs-review status but there's been a number of
> comments/reviews (drive-by, at least) but without any real ask for any
> changes to be made.

LGTM

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2023-07-17 23:34:44 Re: unrecognized node type while displaying a Path due to dangling pointer
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2023-07-17 23:08:03 Re: Atomic ops for unlogged LSN