Re: Consistent coding for the naming of LR workers

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Consistent coding for the naming of LR workers
Date: 2023-07-13 09:29:05
Message-ID: 20230713092905.3cqzfpt6kdic6zqp@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2023-Jul-13, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> I suppose we could just say "logical replication worker" in all cases. That
> should be enough precision for the purpose of these messages.

Agreed. IMO the user doesn't care about specifics.

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2023-07-13 09:29:42 Re: Check lateral references within PHVs for memoize cache keys
Previous Message Richard Guo 2023-07-13 09:21:03 Re: Check lateral references within PHVs for memoize cache keys