Re: logicalrep_message_type throws an error

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: logicalrep_message_type throws an error
Date: 2023-07-11 10:21:56
Message-ID: 20230711102156.vyuw2cf2oeeh2v62@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2023-Jul-11, Masahiko Sawada wrote:

> Since the numerical value is important only in invalid message type
> cases, how about using a format like "??? (88)" in unknown message
> type cases, in both error and context messages?

+1

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Las navajas y los monos deben estar siempre distantes" (Germán Poo)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Sewell 2023-07-11 10:25:23 COPY table FROM STDIN via SPI
Previous Message Jeevan Chalke 2023-07-11 09:48:22 Re: unrecognized node type while displaying a Path due to dangling pointer