Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name
Date: 2023-07-03 22:08:42
Message-ID: 20230703220842.GA3370644@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 04:37:52PM -0700, Yurii Rashkovskii wrote:
> Thank you for revising the patch. While this is relatively minor, I think
> it should be set to MAXPGPATH directly to clarify their relationship.

Committed. I set the size to MAXPGPATH directly instead of inventing a new
macro with the same value.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-07-03 22:13:03 Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2023-07-03 21:13:32 Re: Why is DATESTYLE, ordering ignored for output but used for input ?