From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Extensible storage manager API - SMGR hook Redux |
Date: | 2023-07-01 01:50:07 |
Message-ID: | 20230701015007.fu5nsjaxoird3ejx@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2023-06-30 14:26:44 +0200, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
> index 4c49393fc5..8685b9fde6 100644
> --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
> +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
> @@ -1002,6 +1002,11 @@ PostmasterMain(int argc, char *argv[])
> */
> ApplyLauncherRegister();
>
> + /*
> + * Register built-in managers that are not part of static arrays
> + */
> + register_builtin_dynamic_managers();
> +
> /*
> * process any libraries that should be preloaded at postmaster start
> */
That doesn't strike me as a good place to initialize this, we'll need it in
multiple places that way. How about putting it into BaseInit()?
> -static const f_smgr smgrsw[] = {
> +static f_smgr *smgrsw;
This adds another level of indirection. I would rather limit the number of
registerable smgrs than do that.
> +SMgrId
> +smgr_register(const f_smgr *smgr, Size smgrrelation_size)
> +{
> + MemoryContextSwitchTo(old);
> +
> + pg_compiler_barrier();
Huh, what's that about?
> @@ -59,14 +63,8 @@ typedef struct SMgrRelationData
> * Fields below here are intended to be private to smgr.c and its
> * submodules. Do not touch them from elsewhere.
> */
> - int smgr_which; /* storage manager selector */
> -
> - /*
> - * for md.c; per-fork arrays of the number of open segments
> - * (md_num_open_segs) and the segments themselves (md_seg_fds).
> - */
> - int md_num_open_segs[MAX_FORKNUM + 1];
> - struct _MdfdVec *md_seg_fds[MAX_FORKNUM + 1];
> + SMgrId smgr_which; /* storage manager selector */
> + int smgrrelation_size; /* size of this struct, incl. smgr-specific data */
It looked to me like you determined this globally - why do we need it in every
entry then?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2023-07-01 03:20:08 | Re: RFC: pg_stat_logmsg |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-07-01 01:42:48 | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |