| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example |
| Date: | 2023-06-13 18:15:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20230613181545.GB214002@nathanxps13 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 07:58:02PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> That being said, I still don't understand why you focus on this tiny and not
> really important detail while the module itself is actually broken (for dynamic
> bgworker without s_p_l) and also has some broken behaviors with regards to the
> naptime that are way more likely to hurt third party code that was written
> using this module as an example.
Are you or Aleksander interested in helping improve this module? I'm happy
to help review and/or write patches.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2023-06-13 18:29:20 | Re: pgsql: Fix search_path to a safe value during maintenance operations. |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2023-06-13 18:10:09 | Re: Add wait event for log emission? |